![]() ![]() Targeting Intelligible Speech: A Phonological Approach to Remediation (2nd edition). Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 42: 382–397. Undifferentiated lingual gestures in children with articulation/ phonological disorders. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 25: 329–340. Lingual activity in two speech disordered children’s attempts to produce velar and alveolar stop consonants: Evidence from electropalatographic (EPG) data. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 32: 736–748. Palatometric specification of stop, affricate and sibilant sounds. Journal of Communication Disorders 13: 347–363. An acoustic-articulatory description of children’s defective /s/ productions. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.ĭaniloff, R., Wilcox, K., and Stephens, M. Assessment and Remediation of Articulatory and Phonological Disorders (2nd edition). Ĭreaghead, N., Newman, P., and Secord, W. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 25: 1074–1080. The influence of psycholinguistic variables on articulatory errors in naming in progressive motor speech degeneration. ![]() Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Ĭode, C., Ball, M. Articulation and Phonology in Speech Sound Disorders. Asia-Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing 11: 305–312. Phonological analyses of a case of progressive speech degeneration. Journal of Clinical Speech and Language Studies 20: 1–23.īall, M. Towards an evidence-base for /r/ therapy in English. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders 1: 31–44. Toward an interactional clinical phonetics and phonology. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 18: 447–462. ![]() Phonetic and phonological analysis of progressive speech degeneration: A case study. J., Code, C., Tree, J., Dawe, K., and Kay, J. His most recent books are Principles of Clinical Phonology (Routledge, 2016) and Challenging Sonority (co-edited with N. He has been President of the International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association he is an honorary Fellow of the UK Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists, and a Fellow of the Learned Society of Wales. His main research interests include sociolinguistics, clinical phonetics and phonology, and the linguistics of Welsh. He is co-editor of the journal Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics (Taylor & Francis) and of the book series Studies in Phonetics and Phonology (Equinox), Communication Disorders across Languages (Multilingual Matters), and Language and Speech Disorders (Psychology Press). ![]() He has also presented at conferences around the world. Dr Ball has authored and edited over 35 books, 50 contributions to collections and 100 refereed articles in academic journals. from the University of Wales (Cardiff), and a DLitt degree from Bangor University. He received his bachelor’s degree with honours in Linguistics and English from the University of Wales (Bangor) his Master’s degree in phonetics and linguistics from the University of Essex his Ph.D. Until recently he was Professor of Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics at Linköping University, Sweden, having formerly held the position of Hawthorne-BoRSF Endowed Professor in the Department of Communicative Disorders, at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. Ball is Honorary Professor in the School of Linguistics and English Language at Bangor University, Wales. We hope to have shown, therefore, that not only is stridency deletion not a process, but stridency is not a helpful concept in clinical phonology, and processes are currently used simply as convenient labels with little theoretical validity.ĭr Martin J. The second is the problem of ad hoc process invention by speech-language pathology researchers beyond the limits described in the original theory of natural phonology. The first is a problem with imprecise phonetic description suggesting that a phonological substitution of target alveolar fricatives by dental ones occurs much more often that it really does. Further, evidence is provided from the phonetic level in both normal acquisition and articulatory disorders that supports a sibilant versus non-sibilant analysis, and we consider why sibilant fricatives should provide especial challenges to speakers. We look in turn at patterns of normal phonological development of fricatives in English, and typical patterns found in phonological disorders, and note that these do not provide evidence to support using the concept of stridency. We discuss the difference between stridency and sibilance, and then outline the variety of patterns that are claimed to make up the process. In this account we address phonological processes, and in particular, stridency deletion. Disordered speech, phonological processes, fricatives, stridency deletion, strident, sibilant, phonetic description Abstract ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |